Winning by accumulating differing points assigned to cities and provinces that reflected their importance, majorly dictated player s strategy as it does in real wars. They have many other non historical games where everyone starts out equal, so it wasn't necessary to butcher their best game, but they did anyway. They took that game out and replaced it with a travesty that they have the temerity to call 'historical' It has been reduced as correctly stated before, to a slightly modified 'game of 'RISK' with the ludicrous reasoning of finding game balance between historical accuracy and what they call 'game experience' What ever the hell they mean by that is beyond me, for no one in Hamburg has ever given me a clear explanation. Recently though, those in charge must have gotten their medicines mixed up. It wasn't completely accurate in many things but knowing WW2 history well, I judged it close enough. The old 25 player WW2 world map was my favorite, despite the hour long wait between battles. Bytro has many different ones but I only liked the few 'historical' games they had. I'm way old school at 64 and have been playing and designing war games for 50 years. I've played Call of War since its 2015 beginning. Luckily, lots left lying long, level lower later. Well this was unexpected, so I must say a happy surprise greeting to you all! Loving Life? Losing liberty? Leading ludicrously lengthy lunch lines lately? Lazy lecherous Lords living luxurious lifestyles, likely looted lesser locals, leaving lovely livable locations looking like large litter laced landfill lumps. This review contains spoilers, click expand to view.

Call of war 1942